I’ve never really got the small penis humiliation kink that some guys have. That’s probably because I’m not a fan of humiliation or emotional masochism. I’ve heard pro-dommes say that it’s not exclusively a kink for under-endowed men, but for me I think it’ll always remain a case of YKINMKBYKIOK.
For anyone who does have this particular interest (with equipment to match), and happens to be in Brooklyn tomorrow, then I’ve got good news. Someone is running a teeniest tiniest penis competition. So ice down your junk and head along to claim what will no doubt be a very tiny crown.
I’d guess the gentleman in the image below wouldn’t stand much of a chance of winning. But he does seem to be spreading smiles and happiness wherever he goes.
I found this on the Beautiful CFNM tumblr.
I really don’t get this tiny penis thing.
Firstly, are we talking about the penis or the phallus?
Because the size of a man’s penis will change quite dramatically according to all sorts of variables including the ambiant temperature, what he’s wearing, and what kind of activity he’s engaged in.
As for the size of the phallus, I have nothing to go on.
Men in general don’t know how they ‘compare’ with other men because it’s not considered good etiquette to look too closely at the other guy’s wedding tackle in the changing room showers after a game.
Furthermore there isn’t any reliable information to be had from Tumblr, because so much of the imagery is photoshopped.
But the real point is this. The length and girth of a man’s phallus don’t amount to a hill of beans in terms of his ability to pleasure a woman. Phallocentrity is hopelessly primitive and unimaginative. And it’s not just me saying that. Look at what sexually aware women who take the time and trouble to blog about these things are saying.
Granted, a lot of men have a lot of their self-esteem invested in phallocentric myth, and in that context it may be possible to humiliate them by making disparaging references to size. But once one realises that the phallocentric myth is essentially just another load of rubbish from the rag-bag of myths imposed on us by patriarchy, one becomes immune to insult.
In short, there’s absolutely zero correlation between the size of a man’s phallus and his worth as a human being or his ability to please a woman.
And if men invest a huge amount of their pride in the size, perkiness, and general availability of the phallus, bear in mind that given the realities of male physiology, they are bound to be investing in a depreciating asset over the course of a lifetime.
Of course, the paradoxical tragedy of the phallus is that once its job is done and the post-coital refractory period sets in, reality can only underline the point that women are erotically much more powerful than men.
That’s why it has been pointed out that sexual intercourse, strangely, poses an enormous threat to men because, although entering triumphantly, they always leave diminished.
On a more serious note…I wonder if the officials running this competition will have the contestants pee in a cup when it’s over? You know, just to make sure no one’s taking any under-performance enhancing drugs.
Suzanne